2024-07-24 19:21:07 ◥ teraflops (~teraflops@priet.us) has joined ##email 2024-07-24 19:21:07 ℹ Topic for ##email is "general discussion and support of email, including related protocols, standards, and software || see https://email-channel.github.io/ for more info || Please note that due to on going spam issues we have had to limit participation in this channel to registered users, see libera.chat/guides/registration" 2024-07-24 19:21:07 ℹ Topic set by pj (~pj@user/pj) on Sat, 22 May 2021 09:57:24 2024-07-24 19:21:07 ℹ Channel ##email: 143 nicks (1 op, 1 voiced, 141 regular) 2024-07-24 19:21:09 ℹ Channel created on Wed, 19 May 2021 14:24:34 2024-07-24 19:21:11 ℹ Mode ##email [+Rnt] 2024-07-24 19:21:11 ℹ Channel created on Wed, 19 May 2021 14:24:34 2024-07-24 19:25:51 teraflops hello, I'm implementing mta-sts in my email server and I started to receive reports from google, like this one https://paste.priet.us/p0m7 the policy none part is because I'm still in testing mode? apart from that, the report is ok itself? thanks in advance 2024-07-24 19:30:26 louis-lau It says "no-policy-found". Which seems to be correct, as I can't find a policy either. I'm not entirely sure what your question is 2024-07-24 19:32:11 teraflops if the report is possitive or negative 2024-07-24 19:32:36 louis-lau Postitive or negative for what? 2024-07-24 19:34:40 teraflops for changing fom testing to enforce 2024-07-24 19:34:46 teraflops the mode 2024-07-24 19:35:40 teraflops or do I better wait a bit more for more reports? 2024-07-24 19:36:29 teraflops right now is in testing mode 2024-07-24 19:37:18 louis-lau "total-successful-session-count": 1, 2024-07-24 19:37:33 louis-lau Yes, the one email google delivered to you used TLS 2024-07-24 19:37:37 teraflops yeah that looks like ok ot me but unsure as this is my first time with this 2024-07-24 19:37:42 teraflops os/to 2024-07-24 19:37:56 teraflops thanks for the feedback btw 2024-07-24 19:40:04 ℹ irc: disconnected from server 2024-07-24 19:41:07 ◥ teraflops (~teraflops@priet.us) has joined ##email 2024-07-24 19:41:07 ℹ Topic for ##email is "general discussion and support of email, including related protocols, standards, and software || see https://email-channel.github.io/ for more info || Please note that due to on going spam issues we have had to limit participation in this channel to registered users, see libera.chat/guides/registration" 2024-07-24 19:41:07 ℹ Channel ##email: 143 nicks (1 op, 1 voiced, 141 regular) 2024-07-24 19:41:14 ℹ Channel created on Wed, 19 May 2021 14:24:34 2024-07-24 19:41:17 louis-lau Just fyi your policy says your mx is priet.us, but I don't think that's right. Perhaps that's why it's saying it can't find a policy? 2024-07-24 19:41:54 teraflops im managing 2 domains on the server (ldap) 2024-07-24 19:42:19 louis-lau That doesn't really matter 2024-07-24 19:42:21 teraflops so basically the mx of priet.us points to mail.sleepl.es 2024-07-24 19:42:26 louis-lau The mx seems to be mail.sleepl.es 2024-07-24 19:42:30 teraflops yeah 2024-07-24 19:42:33 louis-lau Yes, so that would be the mx 2024-07-24 19:43:19 teraflops but then the rdns/prt won't fit 2024-07-24 19:44:00 teraflops and that is worse I think 2024-07-24 19:44:03 ◣ bitblit (~bitblit@c-73-14-153-68.hsd1.co.comcast.net) has quit (Ping timeout: 265 seconds) 2024-07-24 19:44:23 louis-lau I don't think I understand 2024-07-24 19:44:54 ◥ bsdhere (~bsduser@user/bsd4me) has joined ##email 2024-07-24 19:45:02 louis-lau Please do explain what you mean 2024-07-24 19:45:18 teraflops it does not matter that much if the mx is another domain isnt it? as fas as it accepts emails from the other domains 2024-07-24 19:45:33 teraflops fas/far 2024-07-24 19:45:46 louis-lau It doesn't 2024-07-24 19:45:53 louis-lau But tls is checked against the mx hostname 2024-07-24 19:46:03 louis-lau And the field isn't called mx for no reason 2024-07-24 19:46:30 louis-lau You put your mx there, not whatever the recipient domain is 2024-07-24 19:46:39 ◣ bsd4me (~bsduser@user/bsd4me) has quit (Ping timeout: 260 seconds) 2024-07-24 19:46:53 teraflops hmm 2024-07-24 19:47:51 louis-lau " A receiving candidate MX host is valid according to an applied MTA- 2024-07-24 19:47:51 louis-lau STS Policy if the MX record name matches one or more of the "mx" 2024-07-24 19:47:51 louis-lau fields in the applied policy. " 2024-07-24 19:48:02 hiya teraflops: when did you set MTA-STS DNS record for priet.us 2024-07-24 19:48:09 hiya A couple of minutes ago? 2024-07-24 19:49:25 teraflops yesterday 2024-07-24 19:49:54 teraflops by night (gmt+2 here) 2024-07-24 19:50:04 louis-lau Sorry I still don't understand the issue :) 2024-07-24 19:50:16 louis-lau Change mx to the right host and it will be fixed 2024-07-24 19:50:42 teraflops I will test, thanks, but I barely remember it not working if I do so 2024-07-24 19:50:43 louis-lau You mentioned some issue, but you haven't really explained what you meant by that 2024-07-24 19:50:53 teraflops I have no issues at all 2024-07-24 19:51:04 teraflops I was asking about the mta-sts report from googlr 2024-07-24 19:51:09 louis-lau > but then the rdns/prt won't fit 2024-07-24 19:51:10 louis-lau > and that is worse I think 2024-07-24 19:51:16 teraflops ah true 2024-07-24 19:51:44 teraflops perhaphs I'm wrong this is all new 2024-07-24 19:51:47 teraflops to me 2024-07-24 19:52:09 teraflops let me change the mx and see what ha`ens 2024-07-24 19:52:11 louis-lau (I'm not that experienced with mta-sts either don't tell anyone xoxo) 2024-07-24 19:53:15 hiya teraflops: yes, MX isn't correct 2024-07-24 19:57:51 ◥ bitblit (~bitblit@c-73-14-153-68.hsd1.co.comcast.net) has joined ##email 2024-07-24 19:58:23 ◣ runxiyu (runxiyu@user/runxiyu) has quit (Quit: ZNC 1.8.2+deb3.1+deb12u1 - https://znc.in) 2024-07-24 19:58:38 ◥ runxiyu (runxiyu@user/runxiyu) has joined ##email 2024-07-24 20:32:45 ◣ runxiyu (runxiyu@user/runxiyu) has quit (Quit: ZNC 1.8.2+deb3.1+deb12u1 - https://znc.in) 2024-07-24 20:32:59 ◥ runxiyu (runxiyu@user/runxiyu) has joined ##email 2024-07-24 20:37:21 ℹ irc: disconnected from server