2024-07-24 19:21:07	◥	teraflops (~teraflops@priet.us) has joined ##email
2024-07-24 19:21:07	ℹ 	Topic for ##email is "general discussion and support of email, including related protocols, standards, and software || see https://email-channel.github.io/ for more info || Please note that due to on going spam issues we have had to limit participation in this channel to registered users, see libera.chat/guides/registration"
2024-07-24 19:21:07	ℹ 	Topic set by pj (~pj@user/pj) on Sat, 22 May 2021 09:57:24
2024-07-24 19:21:07	ℹ 	Channel ##email: 143 nicks (1 op, 1 voiced, 141 regular)
2024-07-24 19:21:09	ℹ 	Channel created on Wed, 19 May 2021 14:24:34
2024-07-24 19:21:11	ℹ 	Mode ##email [+Rnt]
2024-07-24 19:21:11	ℹ 	Channel created on Wed, 19 May 2021 14:24:34
2024-07-24 19:25:51	teraflops	hello, I'm implementing mta-sts in my email server and I started to receive reports from google, like this one https://paste.priet.us/p0m7 the policy none part is because I'm still in testing mode? apart from that, the report is ok itself? thanks in advance
2024-07-24 19:30:26	louis-lau	It says "no-policy-found". Which seems to be correct, as I can't find a policy either. I'm not entirely sure what your question is
2024-07-24 19:32:11	teraflops	if the report is possitive or negative
2024-07-24 19:32:36	louis-lau	Postitive or negative for what?
2024-07-24 19:34:40	teraflops	for changing fom testing to enforce
2024-07-24 19:34:46	teraflops	the mode
2024-07-24 19:35:40	teraflops	or do I better wait a bit more for more reports?
2024-07-24 19:36:29	teraflops	right now is in testing mode
2024-07-24 19:37:18	louis-lau	"total-successful-session-count": 1,
2024-07-24 19:37:33	louis-lau	Yes, the one email google delivered to you used TLS
2024-07-24 19:37:37	teraflops	yeah that looks like ok ot me but unsure as this is my first time with this
2024-07-24 19:37:42	teraflops	os/to
2024-07-24 19:37:56	teraflops	thanks for the feedback btw
2024-07-24 19:40:04	ℹ 	irc: disconnected from server
2024-07-24 19:41:07	◥	teraflops (~teraflops@priet.us) has joined ##email
2024-07-24 19:41:07	ℹ 	Topic for ##email is "general discussion and support of email, including related protocols, standards, and software || see https://email-channel.github.io/ for more info || Please note that due to on going spam issues we have had to limit participation in this channel to registered users, see libera.chat/guides/registration"
2024-07-24 19:41:07	ℹ 	Channel ##email: 143 nicks (1 op, 1 voiced, 141 regular)
2024-07-24 19:41:14	ℹ 	Channel created on Wed, 19 May 2021 14:24:34
2024-07-24 19:41:17	louis-lau	Just fyi your policy says your mx is priet.us, but I don't think that's right. Perhaps that's why it's saying it can't find a policy?
2024-07-24 19:41:54	teraflops	im  managing 2 domains on the server (ldap)
2024-07-24 19:42:19	louis-lau	That doesn't really matter
2024-07-24 19:42:21	teraflops	so basically the mx of priet.us points to mail.sleepl.es
2024-07-24 19:42:26	louis-lau	The mx seems to be mail.sleepl.es
2024-07-24 19:42:30	teraflops	yeah
2024-07-24 19:42:33	louis-lau	Yes, so that would be the mx
2024-07-24 19:43:19	teraflops	but then the rdns/prt won't fit 
2024-07-24 19:44:00	teraflops	and that is worse I think
2024-07-24 19:44:03	◣	bitblit (~bitblit@c-73-14-153-68.hsd1.co.comcast.net) has quit (Ping timeout: 265 seconds)
2024-07-24 19:44:23	louis-lau	I don't think I understand
2024-07-24 19:44:54	◥	bsdhere (~bsduser@user/bsd4me) has joined ##email
2024-07-24 19:45:02	louis-lau	Please do explain what you mean
2024-07-24 19:45:18	teraflops	it does not matter that much if the mx is another domain isnt it? as fas as it accepts emails from the other domains
2024-07-24 19:45:33	teraflops	fas/far
2024-07-24 19:45:46	louis-lau	It doesn't
2024-07-24 19:45:53	louis-lau	But tls is checked against the mx hostname
2024-07-24 19:46:03	louis-lau	And the field isn't called mx for no reason
2024-07-24 19:46:30	louis-lau	You put your mx there, not whatever the recipient domain is
2024-07-24 19:46:39	◣	bsd4me (~bsduser@user/bsd4me) has quit (Ping timeout: 260 seconds)
2024-07-24 19:46:53	teraflops	hmm
2024-07-24 19:47:51	louis-lau	"   A receiving candidate MX host is valid according to an applied MTA-
2024-07-24 19:47:51	louis-lau	   STS Policy if the MX record name matches one or more of the "mx"
2024-07-24 19:47:51	louis-lau	   fields in the applied policy.  "
2024-07-24 19:48:02	hiya	teraflops: when did you set MTA-STS DNS record for priet.us 
2024-07-24 19:48:09	hiya	A couple of minutes ago?
2024-07-24 19:49:25	teraflops	yesterday
2024-07-24 19:49:54	teraflops	by night (gmt+2 here)
2024-07-24 19:50:04	louis-lau	Sorry I still don't understand the issue :)
2024-07-24 19:50:16	louis-lau	Change mx to the right host and it will be fixed
2024-07-24 19:50:42	teraflops	I will test, thanks, but I barely remember it not working if I do so
2024-07-24 19:50:43	louis-lau	You mentioned some issue, but you haven't really explained what you meant by that
2024-07-24 19:50:53	teraflops	I have no issues at all
2024-07-24 19:51:04	teraflops	I was asking about the mta-sts report from googlr
2024-07-24 19:51:09	louis-lau	> but then the rdns/prt won't fit
2024-07-24 19:51:10	louis-lau	> and that is worse I think
2024-07-24 19:51:16	teraflops	ah true
2024-07-24 19:51:44	teraflops	perhaphs I'm wrong this is all new
2024-07-24 19:51:47	teraflops	to me
2024-07-24 19:52:09	teraflops	let me change the mx and see what ha`ens
2024-07-24 19:52:11	louis-lau	(I'm not that experienced with mta-sts either don't tell anyone xoxo)
2024-07-24 19:53:15	hiya	teraflops: yes, MX isn't correct
2024-07-24 19:57:51	◥	bitblit (~bitblit@c-73-14-153-68.hsd1.co.comcast.net) has joined ##email
2024-07-24 19:58:23	◣	runxiyu (runxiyu@user/runxiyu) has quit (Quit: ZNC 1.8.2+deb3.1+deb12u1 - https://znc.in)
2024-07-24 19:58:38	◥	runxiyu (runxiyu@user/runxiyu) has joined ##email
2024-07-24 20:32:45	◣	runxiyu (runxiyu@user/runxiyu) has quit (Quit: ZNC 1.8.2+deb3.1+deb12u1 - https://znc.in)
2024-07-24 20:32:59	◥	runxiyu (runxiyu@user/runxiyu) has joined ##email
2024-07-24 20:37:21	ℹ 	irc: disconnected from server
